#美SEC促进加密资产创新监管框架 Let me tell you about something that happened five years ago.
An old classmate came in with 20,000 USDT, and at the time, his attitude was as if he could buy a new house in three months. The result? Two bad decisions and his principal was wiped out. His face turned green, and only then did he come to ask me what to do.
Three years later, when we met again, his account balance was already steadily in the seven figures. His whole demeanor was completely different—calm and unhurried.
Actually, I’ve paid my share of tuition fees too. In the first few years, I got liquidated, fell into scam platforms, and had several months of consecutive losses... At my worst, my bank balance was less than 10,000. Later, I just kept pushing, writing down every lesson, and gradually figured out my own strategy. Only then did my account start to grow steadily.
These are lessons paid for with real money:
First, when there's a rapid rise but a slow decline, it’s most likely funds accumulating positions. If it rises sharply but falls sluggishly, don’t be fooled by appearances; when it really hits the top, there’s usually a huge bearish candle.
Second, rebounds after a big drop are mostly traps. When the main players want to unload, they’re best at creating the illusion of "opportunity."
Third, high volume at the top isn’t necessarily bad; low volume at the top is truly dangerous. Volume means there’s still a battle between funds; once it dries up, that’s the real warning sign.
Fourth, pay attention to the persistence of volume at the bottom. One or two days of high volume mean little; several consecutive days of sustained volume prove that real funds are entering and building positions.
The rules of the market haven’t really changed—it’s the new batch of entrants that keeps changing. Some chase highs impulsively and get trapped, others get greedy at the bottom and get buried. It’s not about not working hard enough, it’s that the method and direction were wrong from the start. $BTC $ETH $BNB
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-c802f0e8
· 12-05 06:40
To be honest, this theory sounds good, but very few people can actually put it into practice.
View OriginalReply0
MindsetExpander
· 12-05 06:38
Honestly, methodology is worth much more than luck.
View OriginalReply0
MidsommarWallet
· 12-05 06:36
Oh my, this story makes me feel so sad. It must have been really painful at the moment when 20,000 USDT was wiped out to zero.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 12-05 06:29
There's something here, this guy's five-year transformation is pretty unbelievable.
---
Damn, it's that same old "turning a ten-thousand loss into a seven-figure win" story again. I've heard it so many times my ears are getting calluses.
---
No lies detected, but honestly, execution is just too hard. Most people can't even stick with it long enough to figure out their own strategy.
---
I really relate to the low-volume at the top thing. Got burned too many times before I finally understood it.
---
Same old saying: making money is easy, surviving is the hard part.
---
That detail about sustained volume at the bottom is solid. I never noticed how volume exhaustion can be an early warning sign.
---
Classic survivorship bias. Success stories always sound better than failure stories.
---
That's true, but how many people actually remember the lesson?
---
No matter how good the SEC framework is, it can't change the fate of 99% of people chasing highs and selling lows.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 12-05 06:23
Haha, I'm very familiar with this story. There are plenty of people like this around me.
Those who bounce back after hitting zero have figured out one thing—it’s not that making money is hard, it’s that surviving is hard.
When I first entered the market, I was clueless too. Looking at K-lines was like reading a foreign language. Now I realize that the strategy of reduced volume at high positions really works. But honestly, most people still get wiped out because of their emotions.
Wait, what does this have to do with the SEC framework? Feels like you’re talking about two different things.
#美SEC促进加密资产创新监管框架 Let me tell you about something that happened five years ago.
An old classmate came in with 20,000 USDT, and at the time, his attitude was as if he could buy a new house in three months. The result? Two bad decisions and his principal was wiped out. His face turned green, and only then did he come to ask me what to do.
Three years later, when we met again, his account balance was already steadily in the seven figures. His whole demeanor was completely different—calm and unhurried.
Actually, I’ve paid my share of tuition fees too. In the first few years, I got liquidated, fell into scam platforms, and had several months of consecutive losses... At my worst, my bank balance was less than 10,000. Later, I just kept pushing, writing down every lesson, and gradually figured out my own strategy. Only then did my account start to grow steadily.
These are lessons paid for with real money:
First, when there's a rapid rise but a slow decline, it’s most likely funds accumulating positions. If it rises sharply but falls sluggishly, don’t be fooled by appearances; when it really hits the top, there’s usually a huge bearish candle.
Second, rebounds after a big drop are mostly traps. When the main players want to unload, they’re best at creating the illusion of "opportunity."
Third, high volume at the top isn’t necessarily bad; low volume at the top is truly dangerous. Volume means there’s still a battle between funds; once it dries up, that’s the real warning sign.
Fourth, pay attention to the persistence of volume at the bottom. One or two days of high volume mean little; several consecutive days of sustained volume prove that real funds are entering and building positions.
The rules of the market haven’t really changed—it’s the new batch of entrants that keeps changing. Some chase highs impulsively and get trapped, others get greedy at the bottom and get buried. It’s not about not working hard enough, it’s that the method and direction were wrong from the start. $BTC $ETH $BNB