AI's pumping out wild results these days, but here's the catch – how do you verify them without exposing the entire algorithm?
That's where proof of inference shines. zk-snarks crunch the numbers on your input, spit out a compact proof that basically screams "verified, no cap." Math stays hidden, trust stays intact.
Wild how cryptography keeps solving problems we didn't even know we had.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PessimisticLayer
· 12-05 06:00
zk-snarks sound awesome, but to be honest, I still don't really understand them... However, privacy protection is definitely something we need to prioritize.
View OriginalReply0
GasGrillMaster
· 12-05 05:53
The proof of inference you mentioned sounds good, but can this zk-SNARKs setup really completely hide the algorithm logic? It still feels a bit uncertain to me.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiVeteran
· 12-05 05:53
NGL, zk-SNARKs are truly amazing—they handle both privacy and trust at the same time.
View OriginalReply0
BetterLuckyThanSmart
· 12-05 05:40
ngl zk-snarks sound pretty amazing, but can regular people really understand this stuff... forget it, maybe I'm just too dumb.
Friday vibes hitting different ☕
AI's pumping out wild results these days, but here's the catch – how do you verify them without exposing the entire algorithm?
That's where proof of inference shines. zk-snarks crunch the numbers on your input, spit out a compact proof that basically screams "verified, no cap." Math stays hidden, trust stays intact.
Wild how cryptography keeps solving problems we didn't even know we had.