$WEMIX Still believing in a 5% buyback? That's hilarious.
It's equivalent to selling 1 million U, buying back 50,000 U. And the bought-back tokens are not even burned. Isn't that just like selling that 5% again the next time? Then hitting a low point to buy the so-called 5%. What's the good news in that? Implementing an automatic 5% token burn on recharge contracts would be a real positive for the ecosystem—eliminating the chips. Why doesn't the naive DeFi do that? Because they lack vision. They only want to hold endless chips for sale. Even burning 5% isn't acceptable; they can only use the 5% buyback to fool people.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
1 Likes
Reward
1
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ConfusedBearGrandpa
· 11-09 07:17
If you say it like that, his stock would have to fall to 1.5 before selling the stock tomorrow.
View OriginalReply0
CoinCircleYouBrother
· 11-09 06:41
And now, the market capitalization of stocks and cryptocurrencies is not much different at all, so there's a chance to return to 0.2% at 70%.
View OriginalReply0
nonsense
· 11-09 06:41
If it's already so small-minded, why are you still here? What are you hanging around for?
View OriginalReply0
View More
CoinCircleYouBrother
· 11-09 06:40
Don't touch anything below 0.2. The ignorant De stocks are still at 26,000, previously at 38,000. This so-called theft has completely lost the trust of Korean investors. Neither stocks nor coins, the Koreans no longer trust ignorant De.
View OriginalReply0
View More
CoinCircleYouBrother
· 11-09 06:38
Believing in a 5% buyback in this lifetime is also a thing. Truly, it’s like throwing money into a black hole—contract burning and destruction. Blockchain transparency shows he’s unwilling to do it. Still trusting him for a 5% buyback? You could say that a 5% buyback is foolish—there's essentially no cost. But burning and destroying tokens actually reduces the amount of coins in circulation.
$WEMIX Still believing in a 5% buyback? That's hilarious.
It's equivalent to selling 1 million U, buying back 50,000 U.
And the bought-back tokens are not even burned. Isn't that just like selling that 5% again the next time? Then hitting a low point to buy the so-called 5%.
What's the good news in that?
Implementing an automatic 5% token burn on recharge contracts would be a real positive for the ecosystem—eliminating the chips.
Why doesn't the naive DeFi do that? Because they lack vision. They only want to hold endless chips for sale.
Even burning 5% isn't acceptable; they can only use the 5% buyback to fool people.