Why the International Monetary Fund calls the global stablecoin turmoil a major threat and the measures that regulators must take.

This article discusses the International Monetary Fund (IMF)'s severe warning about the systemic risks posed by the $305 billion global stablecoin market, emphasizing the urgent need for regulatory action. The article points out that fragmented regulatory measures create a breeding ground for cross-border risks and highlights the threats to global financial stability and emerging markets. By advocating for a unified international oversight solution, the article identifies gaps in the current regulatory framework and proposes coordinated strategies for effective stablecoin management. It calls upon policymakers, financial regulators, and cryptocurrency stakeholders seeking to protect the financial system. Keywords include IMF, stablecoin, financial stability, regulation, and risk management.

International Monetary Fund's warning: Global stablecoin turmoil threatens financial stability

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has issued a severe assessment of the digital asset space, placing stablecoins at the center of emerging financial vulnerabilities. In its latest Financial Stability Report, the IMF identifies a $305 billion stablecoin market as a systemic risk that requires urgent regulatory intervention. This warning is particularly striking given the agency's mandate to monitor threats to the international monetary and financial system. Stablecoins are typically pegged to fiat currencies, such as the US dollar, and are backed by liquid assets including government bonds and bank deposits, experiencing explosive growth in recent years. However, their rapid expansion has outpaced the coordinated development of a global regulatory framework for stablecoins, creating dangerous gaps in oversight and risk management. The IMF's concerns are not limited to market size but also encompass structural vulnerabilities. As stablecoins are susceptible to runs—sudden large-scale redemptions triggered by a loss of confidence—the sell-off of their reserve assets could spill over into the markets for bank deposits, government bonds, and repos, creating a domino effect. The organization emphasizes that if stablecoin issuers are forced to liquidate these large reserves to fund redemptions, their current scale could impact the overall government bond market. This represents a qualitative shift in systemic risk, as a once-niche category of digital assets has now grown into a potential destabilizing force within traditional financial infrastructure.

Fragmented regulation: a breeding ground for cross-border risks

The current global stablecoin regulatory framework resembles a patchwork quilt rather than a coherent system, with different jurisdictions implementing vastly different frameworks, resulting in significant cross-border vulnerabilities. This regulatory fragmentation has created various concerning dynamics.cryptocurrencyRegulatory challenges and the broader financial system. Countries on different continents have taken incompatible approaches to stablecoin regulation, ranging from a loose environment that promotes rapid innovation to restrictive regimes that effectively ban stablecoin operations. This inconsistency allows stablecoin operators to engage in regulatory arbitrage, shifting their business to the most favorable jurisdictions while providing services to users across multiple borders. The cross-border nature of digital payments means that financial stress events originating from a stablecoin ecosystem in one jurisdiction can quickly spread to others, especially since many stablecoins are designed for seamless global transactions. The Financial Stability Board and central bank authorities emphasize that widely adopted global stablecoins could become systemically important means of payment across multiple jurisdictions, potentially undermining central banks' ability to control monetary policy and maintain financial stability. Emerging markets face particular vulnerability to the fragmentation of stablecoins, as USD-denominated stablecoins may accelerate the dollarization effect, reduce demand for local currency, and complicate the transmission mechanism of monetary policy. The lack of unified standards means that there are significant differences in the composition of reserve assets, redemption guarantees, operational resilience requirements, and cybersecurity protocols among different stablecoin issuers and jurisdictions. This inconsistency creates information asymmetries for users and investors, obscuring the actual risks involved in various stablecoin arrangements and hindering accurate assessments of systemic risks in the financial system.

$300 billion stablecoin market: too big to ignore, too fast to control

The explosive growth trajectory of the stablecoin market requires us to examine its impact on global financial stability risks. With a market value of approximately $305 billion, stablecoins have transformed from a marginal cryptocurrency phenomenon into an important component of broader financial infrastructure, especially in cross-border transactions and emerging market economies. This expansion has occurred very rapidly—the stablecoin market has grown from a nearly negligible level five years ago to occupy a significant portion of digital asset activity. The scale of the market now makes it impossible to regard stablecoin issues merely as problems of the cryptocurrency industry, as their integration with traditional finance has deepened significantly. Major financial institutions and banks have entered the stablecoin business, particularly following regulatory clarifications such as the U.S. 'Genius Act,' which established a new regulatory framework for digital assets. This institutional participation has accelerated adoption while concentrating systemic risks within the formal financial system, rather than limiting them to dedicated cryptocurrency platforms. Analysis by the International Monetary Fund indicates that a sharp contraction in stablecoin demand—whether due to technical failures, regulatory crackdowns, or loss of confidence—will require large-scale liquidation of reserve assets. These reserve pools now contain substantial amounts of government bonds, bank deposits, and other highly liquid but ultimately limited assets. If multiple stablecoin issuers attempt to liquidate reserves simultaneously during periods of stress, the market impact could significantly disrupt pricing in the government bond market, lead to sudden pressures in the bank deposit market, and trigger instability in the repurchase market that supports short-term financing for global financial institutions.

Market indicatorsCurrent Statussystematic impact
stablecoin total market capitalization$305 billionThe total amount of currency comparable to the economy of a medium-sized country.
Main reserve asset typesU.S. Treasury bonds and bank depositsInterconnectivity with core financial infrastructure
Institutional participation growthIncreased participation of banks after regulationAchieve systemic importance through the integration of the banking system
Cross-border transactions usingdominate in emerging marketsVulnerability to dollarization and damage to monetary policy
regulatory coveragedivided by jurisdictionCreate arbitrage opportunities and monitor gaps

Urgent Call for Unified Global Regulation: Solution Proposed by the International Monetary Fund

In response to the increasing risks within the stablecoin ecosystem, global emergency coordination is crucial. The International Monetary Fund calls for the establishment of a unified international regulatory framework that crosses borders to eliminate regulatory arbitrage. The organization suggests that a neutral global institution draft model laws, similar to the approach of the Uniform Commercial Code, so that each jurisdiction can adopt consistent rules to govern the issuance, reserves, redemption rights, and operational resilience of stablecoins.

The International Monetary Fund emphasizes that no global stablecoin should be launched until all legal, regulatory, and supervisory standards set by institutions such as the Financial Stability Board and central banks are met. National authorities need stronger data collection systems to monitor cross-border flows, reserve composition, and redemption activities, enabling them to detect liquidity pressures and vulnerabilities early. Regulators must also enforce minimum high-quality liquid reserve requirements and clear redemption guarantees to protect users' interests during market turbulence.

To prevent contagion and conflicts of interest, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) calls for a strict separation between the issuance of stablecoins and other financial services. International cooperation must be expanded, including real-time information sharing, coordinated stress testing, and synchronized regulatory actions. Trading platforms, including those that facilitate broad access to digital assets like Gate, will need to enhance due diligence and reporting as the use of stablecoins is on the rise.

Monetary authorities should define how the adoption of stablecoins affects the transmission of monetary policy, especially in emerging markets facing risks related to dollarization and capital flow volatility. Unified regulation, stronger reserves, clear redemption rules, and coordinated global oversight form the basis of the recommendations made by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to ensure financial stability as stablecoins become more integrated into the global economy.

* The information is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice or any other recommendation of any sort offered or endorsed by Gate.